How'd Hillary be doing?

I had a stock answer throughout the primaries to the never ending questions about whether Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton was more electable in the general election. I thought that only Barack could lose but that he also had a significantly higher support ceiling than Hillary. Since this is one of the few times when I think I’m right about something I said in the primary season, let me briefly explain why Hillary would most likely not be doing as well as Obama is right now.
 
The plot below of Clinton and Obama’s Gallup unfavorable ratings during the primary months tells much of the story. As can be seen, Clinton’s unfavorables were consistently around 10 to 15 points higher than Obama’s. Perhaps more importantly, these opinions of Clinton are the product of fifteen years worth of considerations about her. Obama’s inexperience, on the other hand, necessarily means the public brings less prior information to bear in evaluating him. The upshot is that opinions about Clinton should be more crystallized and thus more resistant to changing national and campaign dynamics.
 
teslergraphic
 
This is precisely why I thought Obama had a lower floor and a higher ceiling than Clinton. Much the way Sarah Palin’s gaffes get 100 times more attention than Joe Biden’s, campaign missteps or scandal would have been way more devastating to Obama than Clinton because Americans have less offsetting information about him stored up in their memories. At the same time, though, Clinton could never have benefited as much as Obama seems to have from strong debate performances and the economy crashing. For everyone already had an opinion of her and 45 percent of them were negative. Simply put, it’s extremely hard to envision a scenario from these unfavorable numbers where general election candidate Clinton registers the 62 percent favorability rating that Obama received in the latest Gallup poll.
 
I’m always perplexed, then, when I hear matter of fact assertions about how much better Clinton would be doing than Obama right now because she’s white. How could any white candidate rack up the 6+ point win that Obama seems poised to capture if half of the country already disliked him.
 
Sorry to open up old wounds from the primary here, but Obama is positioned to earn a mandate that Hillary Clinton’s polarizing personality and campaign tactics probably never could have.
 
On-topic comments that add to the discussion are welcome. Please respect each other and the forum by using your real name and a civil tone. Spam and comments judged by UCLA to be libelous, offensive or abusive may be deleted without notice

Comments

film izle says:

http://www.filmleriizle.net porno izle, sikiş izle

Pia says:

Now the choice is electoral is fallen. The winner is OBama. Do you think afterwards that was the right decision? Or do you think it could be different with Hillary? Do you think that one of them were more honest for the campaign? Pia http://www.friwo.de

pri says:

http://optimalis.blogspot.com http://gurumu.blogspot.com http://ourequity.blogspot.com http://tanehkaro.blogspot.com http://tradingpost.tk http://homeequity.tk http://makalahmu.blogspot.com http://tradecommodity.tk http://susuki.tk http://trading.jmin.net http://myphone.jmin.net http://optimalis.blogspot.com http://gurumu.blogspot.com http://ourequity.blogspot.com http://tanehkaro.blogspot.com http://tradingpost.tk http://homeequity.tk http://makalahmu.blogspot.com http://tradecommodity.tk http://susuki.tk http://trading.jmin.net http://myphone.jmin.net http://optimalis.blogspot.com http://gurumu.blogspot.com http://ourequity.blogspot.com http://tanehkaro.blogspot.com http://tradingpost.tk http://homeequity.tk http://makalahmu.blogspot.com http://tradecommodity.tk http://susuki.tk http://trading.jmin.net http://myphone.jmin.net http://optimalis.blogspot.com http://gurumu.blogspot.com http://ourequity.blogspot.com http://tanehkaro.blogspot.com http://tradingpost.tk http://homeequity.tk http://makalahmu.blogspot.com http://tradecommodity.tk http://susuki.tk http://trading.jmin.net http://myphone.jmin.net

welehweleh says:

This is actually really interesting regarding your fact article here, This article is very informative. http://www.moratmarit.com/2009/08/kenali-dan-kunjungi-objek-wisata-di.html | http://www.moratmarit.com/2009/09/oes-tsetnoc-contestants-from-indonesia.html | http://www.moratmarit.com/ | http://www.cahbagoes.com/ | http://blogger.moratmarit.com/

Cih says:

Thanks for sharing. http://www.cheapestcarinsurancehome.com/ http://www.cheaplimoservicesandrentals.com/ http://www.cheapselfstoragefacilities.com/ http://divorceline.org/blog/ http://www.caraccidentsinfo.com/

Mary says:

Hillary is hillarious according to charts:) Mary and healthy lifestyle at http://www.healblog.net

Name *
Mail (will not be published) *
Comment *
Please type in the code you see to the right of the text box.
 
CAPTCHA code image
Change the code

RSS Alerts

About

Election analysis and personal commentary by UCLA scholars, unfiltered.

 

News release

 

Contact UCLA Newsroom

RSS Feed

Our Bloggers

Frank Gilliam

Dean of the UCLA School of Public Affairs and professor of political science.

Gary Orfield

Professor of education, law, political science and urban plannning.

Paul Ong

Professor of urban planning, social welfare, and Asian American studies.

Patricia Gándara

Professor of education and co-director of the Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA.

Mark A. R. Kleiman

Professor of public policy.

Amy Zegart

Associate professor of public policy.

Mark Sawyer

Associate professor of political science and director of the UCLA Center for the Study of Race, Ethnicity and Politics.

Dr. David Zingmond

Assistant professor-in-residence of medicine.

Lynn Vavreck

Assistant professor of political science.

Tim Groeling

Assistant professor of communication studies.

Ryan Enos

Ph.D. candidate in political science.

Michael Tesler

Graduate student in political science.

Terms of Use University of California Office of Media Relations and Public Outreach
© 2009 UC Regents.